• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Center for Competitive Politics Continues to Fight for the First Amendment Speech Rights

Center for Competitive Politics Continues to Fight for the First Amendment Speech Rights
Chuck Muth
March 2, 2017

(David Keating, Center for Competitive Politics) – On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed without comment a ruling against CCP’s client, the Independence Institute. The Court’s order reflects agreement with the lower court’s result, but not necessarily its reasoning. The order does not indicate how any of the justices voted or why.

The ruling marks a sad day for the First Amendment and for the right to criticize government officials.

In this case, the Institute sought to run a radio ad urging citizens to contact their U.S. senators and express their support for a sentencing reform bill. The ad would not talk about an election or advocate in any way for the election or defeat of any candidates. Yet to run the ad, the McCain-Feingold law forces the Institute to file reports with the Federal Election Commission revealing private information about donors who gave money to support airing the ad. That is because the Institute wanted to run the ad within 60 days of a general election. If the ad ran on the 61st day before the election, it would not be covered by the law.

We believe the law violates the First Amendment, and the Court made an egregious error. The government does not have a right or a need to force citizens to tell the government about their views or their contact with other citizens.

The attorneys and the rest of the team at the Center for Competitive Politics gave this case our all, and we had stellar support. U.S. Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Philanthropy Roundtable, the State Policy Network and 24 affiliated state think tanks, and the Institute for Justice and the Cato Institute, among others, filed amicus briefs urging the Supreme Court to fully consider the case. Ten First Amendment scholars also filed a joint brief.

In one sense, the law is the same today as it was last week. The regulation under the McCain-Feingold law that affected our client has been in effect since 2007. Unfortunately, it still stands.

Yet other, and worse, laws were passed in the wake of McCain-Feingold. New laws, such as one recently passed in New York, expand similar laws far beyond 60 days or earmarked donations.

Such laws provide little, if any, value to the public. Politicians who pass them often seek to silence dissent and enable harassment of those who don’t share their views.

Everyone here at CCP will continue our fight in the courts to defeat and limit the reach of these laws. We will also continue to explain to Americans the dangers invasive disclosure requirements pose to their First Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court has not ruled on intrusive laws that affect issue speech made more than 60 days before an election. It has not yet considered laws that force disclosure for donors who give to a nonprofit organization, but have not earmarked their donations for “election-related” speech. When such laws are eventually heard by the Supreme Court, we think there is a good chance the Court will find them unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly found that donor privacy is essential for free speech and expressing a range of views on public policy issues.

Our goal now, as always, is to vindicate those rights in our current and future cases.

Thank you for your support as CCP continues to fight for your First Amendment speech rights.

 

David Keating is President for the Center for Competitive Politics (CCP).

Prev postNext post

Related Itemsgovernment
Government
March 2, 2017
Chuck Muth

Related Itemsgovernment

More in Government

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

Amodei vs. Biden: Debunking Misinformation on Debt and Border Policies

NN&V StaffMay 23, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Lombardo’s Veto Message on AB354 (Gun Control)

NN&V StaffMay 17, 2023
Read More

Lombardo’s Veto Message on AB355 (Gun Control)

NN&V StaffMay 17, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Mitchell: Trump orders feds to review Obama-era water grab
Weinberg: If the Republicans in Congress Don’t Rip Apart Obamacare Brick by Brick, They’ll End Up Just Like Nevada in 2016