• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Crush Crony Capitalism in a Senate Appropriations Bill

Crush Crony Capitalism in a Senate Appropriations Bill
Chuck Muth
July 13, 2016

16238a4f-4f8b-465c-9769-251c76556911

(Dan Horowitz, TownHall) Since the dawn of the progressive era, the government has not ceased in passing occupational licensing laws — mandates requiring entrepreneurs first possess a government license allowing them to sell a good or perform a service — each in the name of “protecting” the people. In most cases, however, these schemes aren’t truly passed to save lives, but rather to protect existing business interests while artificially increasing prices consumers pay.

The government has imposed hefty fines on barbers for not carrying government licenses. It has thrown women in jail for braiding others’ hair without government approval. Governments have forced citizens to take a test just to sell a flower arrangement – a test graded by existing florists. And now, the government plans to impose hefty fines and punishments on online contact lens vendors for the “crime” of successfully competing against the medical lobby.

Over the years, the eyecare industry has been subjected to a long and windy road of crony capitalism. Before 1978, the government allowed eye doctors to control exactly which brand of contacts their consumers could use and purchase. Doctors were not obligated to provide customers with a copy of their prescriptions, nor were they obligated to allow customers to shop around for better pricing. Whatever the doctor said went. Usually, this meant mandating that consumers purchase lenses directly from their own office at whatever inflated cost they set.
Click here to continue reading

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
July 13, 2016
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Caldara: The GOP’s Master Plan to Keep Losing

NN&V StaffFebruary 3, 2024
Read More

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2024 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

These officers picked up the bill for diners who didn’t want to sit next to them
T-shirt Printer Adds Profanity to Kid’s Donald Trump Tee