• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Don’t Blame American Sugar Farmers for the High Cost of M&Ms

Don’t Blame American Sugar Farmers for the High Cost of M&Ms
N&V Staff
April 18, 2018

(Chuck Muth) – A recent editorial critical of the U.S. sugar program published by the Treasure Coast newspaper in Florida started out thusly…

“You spy that bag of M&Ms in the checkout line and you’re tempted. But $1.79 seems kind of steep.  In fact, it is. Most food containing American-grown sugar costs significantly more than it would if sugar prices were lower.”

Well, duh.  M&Ms would cost less if chocolate prices were lower, too.  Or more to the point, if the cost of labor was lower.  Or the cost of insurance.  Or the cost of regulatory compliance.  Or TAXES!

Even more to the point, that bag of M&Ms probably cost in the neighborhood of 35-cents 35 years ago when a pound of American-grown sugar cost about the same as it costs today.

So to blame the fact that you need to take out a second mortgage to buy a bag of M&Ms today on the cost of American-grown sugar is simply dishonest.

The editorial goes on the claim that “U.S. sugar policy is protectionist, anchored in government intervention in the free market.”

This is partially true.  The U.S. sugar program does limit imports from certain countries and tacks on nominal tariffs to the sugar imports of others.  But that “protectionism” is because the global sugar market is anything BUT a free market.

The fact is various sugar-producing countries – including Brazil, the “OPEC of sugar” – distort the market by directly subsidizing their home-grown sugar industries, artificially deflating the cost and giving global competitors a decidedly unfair advantage over American sugar farmers.

To its credit, the newspaper acknowledges this reality…

“(D)efenders of the current sugar program cite the heavy subsidization of the sugar industry in countries like Mexico. If there’s truly to be a level playing field, they say, foreign competitors must play by the same rules.”

Exactly.

For it to be a true free market, foreign governments need to eliminate the “crutches” they provide to their sugar industries in the form of subsidies before Congress should consider eliminating the current U.S. sugar program.  Which is exactly what Rep. Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” resolution would do.

You eliminate yours and we’ll eliminate ours.

Now, about those taxes…

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment
Business
April 18, 2018
N&V Staff

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment

More in Business

Government Export Cap Backfires on Indian Sugar Producers

N&V StaffJuly 6, 2022
Read More

NEW STUDY: U.S. Sugar Industry Good for the Economy, Jobs

N&V StaffJune 19, 2022
Read More

Citizen Outreach Opposes FDA’s Proposed Ban on Flavored Cigars

N&V StaffJune 17, 2022
Read More

Policy Shifts in India, Brazil Signal Price Hikes for International Sugar

N&V StaffJune 1, 2022
Read More

Zero for Zero the Solution to Global Sugar Subsidies

N&V StaffApril 26, 2022
Read More

Sugar Shortages and Shopping Cart Fights

N&V StaffMarch 28, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Million Reduction in Nevada’s Contingent Litigation Liabilities
Congress Should Focus on the REAL Problems Hurting Kimmee Candy