• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

Economist’s Theory on Sugar Program Not Grounded in Reality

Economist’s Theory on Sugar Program Not Grounded in Reality
N&V Staff
October 18, 2016

a

(Chuck Muth) – In a recent opinion column appearing in the Gainesville Sun, Dave Denslow, “a retired University of Florida economics professor,” lashed out at Florida Congressman Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” proposal for reforming the U.S. sugar program.

Mr. Denslow’s Verdict: It won’t work.

This immediately reminded me of an old quote by Ronald Reagan, who defined an “economist” as “someone who sees something that works in practice and wonders if it would work in theory.”

In this case, we have an economist who sees something that’s not working in reality but declares an as-yet-untried proposal to fix the problem to be theoretically unworkable in practice.  It’s the reverse side of the same coin.

Zero for Zero is a simple, common-sense concept.

If global trading partners stop providing direct government subsidies to their sugar-producing industries – which give them an unfair and unbalanced advantage over U.S. producers by artificially lowering the cost of their homegrown sugar – the U.S. government will lift its comparatively minor quotas and tariffs on imports.

The exact title of the resolution pretty much says it all:

“H.Con.Res.20 – Expressing the sense of Congress that all direct and indirect subsidies that benefit the production or export of sugar by all major sugar producing and consuming countries should be eliminated.”

You zero out yours and we’ll zero out ours.  Who can argue with that?

In his effort to do so, Mr. Denslow trots out the usual argument that the current U.S. sugar program “forces us to pay more for sugar and sweets.”  But that’s simply not true; not even theoretically.

The cost of U.S. sugar is almost exactly the same price as it was when Reagan was in office.  So if we’re paying more for sweets today – and we are – it’s due to factors other than the price of sugar; including labor, taxes, insurance, government regulations and, of course, profit-taking.

Mr. Denslow’s theoretical solution is one the candy-makers have been trying to get Congress to adopt, without success, for years: Unilaterally eliminate the U.S. sugar program without any similar concessions by foreign competitors and throw American sugar farmers to the wolves.

Even in theory, that’s just a dumb idea.  It won’t work.  Time to try something else that makes a whole lot more sense.  Zero for Zero is that something else.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
October 18, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Featured Article

Nevada’s new vaccine rollout to prioritize elderly and essential workforces

The Center SquareJanuary 14, 2021
Read More

Sisolak praises Congress’ certification of electoral votes following day of chaos at U.S. Capitol

The Center SquareJanuary 11, 2021
Read More

Nevada sees 60 COVID-19 deaths, marking one-day record

The Center SquareJanuary 8, 2021
Read More

Triggering Snowflakes and Buttercups

N&V StaffJanuary 4, 2021
Read More

The Governor’s Arrogant Climate Plan

N&V StaffJanuary 4, 2021
Read More

The Story of the Woman Who Freed Nevada’s Churches

N&V StaffJanuary 3, 2021
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics Muth's Truths business government Government Opinion Obama News Donald Trump GOP Republicans Ron Knecht Adam Laxalt

Copyright © 2020 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

To Heck with Congressman Heck? Not So Fast…
Get Off Trump’s Back about “Rigged” Elections