• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Galen: 3rd Party Candidates

Galen: 3rd Party Candidates
N&V Staff
May 16, 2016

Rich Galen(Rich Galen, Mullings) – An A-1 story in Sunday’s Washington Post examined the frenzied activity surrounding what appears to be a diminishing number of Republican Party insiders to find and fund a candidate to run as an independent for President this Fall.

The lede by Post reporters Philip Rucker and Robert Costa read:

A band of exasperated Republicans – including 2012 presidential nominee Mitt Romney, a handful of veteran consultants and members of the conservative intelligentsia – is actively plotting to draft an independent presidential candidate who could keep Donald Trump from the White House.

As you are all too aware, I am most assuredly not a member of the “conservative intelligentsia.” I am neither that smart nor that conservative.

It is almost impossible to see how, at this late date, a citizen can be plucked out of the 323.5 million people who live in the United States who meets the Constitutional requirements (natural born at least 35 years ago, and a resident of the U.S. for at least 14 years) and can demonstrate the excitement, ideas, and philosophy that will allow him or her to win enough states to generate 270 electoral votes.

Alternatively, as the article points out, you might be able to find someone who can win just enough states to keep either of the two major party candidates from reaching the magic 270 votes.

That would throw the election for President into the U.S. House (and the election for VP into the U.S. Senate) under the terms of the 12th Amendment.

Here’s what the Constitution says on the matter:

If no person have [a majority of Electoral College votes], then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote.

I think this says the House only gets to choose from three people who have actually run for President.

“But wait, Rich,” I can hear you saying. “It doesn’t say all three have to have won electoral votes, so all someone needs to do is get on the ballot of one state, right?”

Good catch, Sparky, but even someone with my limited math skills knows that if only two people have won electoral votes one of them will have gotten a majority of them (270).

The 12th Amendment also says that the House Members don’t vote as individuals, but as states; Wyoming gets exactly the same number of votes as California.

One.

The Senate, for its part, does vote as individuals and gets to choose from the top two vote-getters in the election. It is quite possible that the President and Vice President might be of different parties.

Talk about ‘cher gridlock.

But, before any of that can happen, the aforementioned conservative intelligentsia have to convince someone to take the plunge and run as an independent.

Over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries, third parties in Presidential politics have been largely the creation of an individual. The Progressive Party in the election of 1912 (popularly known as the Bull Moose Party) was a creature of Teddy Roosevelt.

More recently, the Reform Party (election of 1996) only existed as a serious force in American politics as long as Ross Perot was its standard bearer.

The Green Party was a very big deal in 2000 when Ralph Nader was the front man. Anyone want to hazard a guess as to the Green Party’s candidate in 2016?

Only if you did what I did: Googled it.

The answer is, it is likely to be Jill Stein of Massachusetts. (Oh, THAT’s right) You probably also don’t know that she was the Green Party’s nominee in 2012, as well.

See what I mean about third parties being a cult of personality?

The one-third party that doesn’t quite fit the bill is the Libertarian party. In 2008, its candidate was former Congressman Bob Barr and got 523,686 votes or 4/10ths of one percent.

In 2012, the Libertarians looked to former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson who got 1,275,951 votes, 0.99% of the total. Johnson is running again in 2016.

Third parties and throwing elections into the U.S. House make for good copy and fun coffee shop discussions for 2nd year law students but, at least this year, it isn’t likely to happen.

Again.

 

Mr. Galen is a veteran political strategist and communications consultant.  He blogs at www.Mullings.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
May 16, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Opinion

Question 1 on Nevada Ballot is Not What It Seems

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Roadmap To Saving Nevada

Troy La ManaOctober 21, 2022
Read More

The Lil Governor That Couldn’t

Troy La ManaOctober 10, 2022
Read More

Nevada Continues To Fail Our Students

Troy La ManaOctober 9, 2022
Read More

This Failed Policy Needs To End

Troy La ManaOctober 8, 2022
Read More

Viguerie: If We Stand Up for Parents’ Rights Now, We Will Win!

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

San Andreas Fault Is On The Brink Of A Devastating Earthquake
What Do Nixon, Einstein, the Titanic and Critics of the U.S. Sugar Program have in Common?