• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

SCOTUS blows opportunity to protect First Amendment

SCOTUS blows opportunity to protect First Amendment
N&V Staff
June 30, 2016

aa

(David Keating) – On Wednesday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear our appeal in Delaware Strong Families v. Denn.

This lawsuit challenged a radical Delaware disclosure law that took effect in 2013. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a six-page dissent denouncing the Court’s refusal to hear the case. Such dissents are highly unusual. Justice Samuel Alito also announced that he would have granted review.

The Center for Competitive Politics handled this case from the beginning. The question presented in this lawsuit was simple. Should the state have the power to regulate groups that publish nonpartisan voter guides in the same way that it regulates candidate committees, political parties, and PACs?

Obviously, we are disappointed. We won an injunction in district court and our client was able to publish their voting guide in 2014. However, the appeals court reversed the decision, which led to our Supreme Court appeal.

This was a great case with great facts. It gave the Court an opportunity to clarify the enormous confusion that now exists about what kind of laws that invade donor privacy are now permissible under the First Amendment. The Court’s refusal does not set any precedent nationally. However, it represents a missed opportunity to protect donor privacy.

As CCP Chairman Brad Smith noted in our press statement, “Eventually the Supreme Court is going to have to decide if Buckley v. Valeo is still good law, or if the government has a right to know about and publicly disclose your affiliations and memberships every time a candidate is mentioned.”

The landmark Buckley case said that donor disclosure was only permissible for activities supporting or opposing the election of candidates.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas wrote…

“Even if the Court were to evaluate the Disclosures Act by applying its existing framework, the Delaware scheme sweeps far broader than those the Court has previously considered….[I]f the Court is determined to stand by its ‘exacting scrutiny’ test, then this case is its proving ground. By refusing to review the constitutionality of the Delaware law, the Court sends a strong message that ‘exacting scrutiny’ means no scrutiny at all.”

As CCP noted in its brief to the Supreme Court…

“Fundamentally, the State’s demand contravenes this Court’s cornerstone campaign finance opinions in Buckley [v. Valeo], McConnell v. FEC, and Citizens United v. FEC. While those cases did uphold limited disclosure against constitutional challenges, they did not grant the government carte blanche. To the contrary, they emphasized that compulsory disclosure is constitutional only in narrow circumstances….[T]he information [Delaware] demands is … likely to mislead the voters….”

Despite this frustrating decision, we are determined to continue to fight for freedom of speech and donor privacy. Our other cases, and those we will bring in the future, will provide new opportunities for the Supreme Court to reaffirm our First Amendment rights.

Mr. Keating is president of the Center for Competitive Politics

 

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
June 30, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Government

Myth-Buster: Sugar Policy Misconception Debunked

N&V StaffFebruary 23, 2021
Read More

Cheat Sugar, Not Cheap Sugar, is the Problem

N&V StaffFebruary 16, 2021
Read More

India Battling Sugar Subsidy Addiction

N&V StaffJanuary 25, 2021
Read More

Sisolak’s Proposed Budget a Slap Across Nevada’s Face

N&V StaffJanuary 21, 2021
Read More

Katie Williams Predicts Return to Clark County Classrooms in February

N&V StaffJanuary 21, 2021
Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Restores In-Person Requirement for Chemical Abortions

N&V StaffJanuary 14, 2021
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics Muth's Truths business government Government Opinion Obama News Donald Trump GOP Republicans Ron Knecht Adam Laxalt

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

California among 8 states to vote on legal weed in November
Oregon mother fatally shoots intruder found in her child’s bedroom